What facility size (gross and rentable square feet) supports economies of scale?

Hello LandBank

The ideal facility size—in both gross square feet (GSF) and rentable square feet (RSF)—is crucial for achieving economies of scale in self-storage development. Economies of scale occur when fixed costs like staffing, maintenance, security, and marketing are spread across a large volume of rentable units, increasing operational efficiency and long-term profitability. A properly sized facility balances market demand, construction cost efficiency, and operational leverage.

1. Minimum Threshold for Economies of Scale

  • A facility typically needs at least 60,000 to 70,000 GSF and 45,000 to 55,000 RSF to begin realizing operational efficiency.
  • At this size, full-time staff, security systems, and marketing campaigns are more cost-effective per rentable unit.
  • Facilities below 40,000 RSF may struggle to sustain competitive pricing while covering fixed expenses.

2. Optimal Size Range for Market and Investment Viability

  • Most institutional-grade and investment-grade facilities range from 80,000 to 120,000 GSF, yielding 60,000 to 90,000 RSF.
  • This size supports 600–1,000 rentable units across a variety of sizes and unit types.
  • Larger facilities can offer tiered pricing, flexible promotions, and longer-term revenue stability through tenant diversification.

3. Rentable Area Efficiency Targets

  • A strong facility design achieves a rentable-to-gross efficiency ratio of 70% to 80%, depending on layout, climate control, and multi-story configuration.
  • Single-story drive-up layouts tend toward 70%, while multi-story climate-controlled layouts with central corridors and elevators can reach 75–80%.
  • Efficient RSF increases revenue potential without inflating construction or land costs.

4. Site Size Required to Support Scalable Development

  • A 3- to 5-acre parcel typically accommodates 80,000 to 120,000 GSF depending on setbacks, drive aisles, parking, and stormwater features.
  • Multi-story design allows larger GSF on smaller parcels, especially in urban or infill areas where land costs are high.
  • Sites with sufficient depth and access allow loop circulation and flexible unit layouts, reducing development waste.

5. Operational Efficiencies Enabled by Scale

  • At larger sizes, facilities can justify full-time staff, integrated access control systems, advanced marketing platforms, and better automation tools.
  • Larger footprints allow for bulk purchasing of materials, more efficient maintenance routines, and reduced staffing per square foot.
  • Greater RSF allows smoother absorption of promotional discounts, tenant churn, and variable leasing trends.

Join The Discussion

Compare listings

Compare